

Read our most Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs).
View the Columbia Pike Streetcar Project brochure.
Updated 2/20/2008
- Increase mobility within the corridor
- Contribute to and serve as a catalyst for economic development
- Provide a safe environment for all modes of travel
- Improve regional connections
- Complement community goals to create a pedestrian-friendly main-street environment
|

Pike Transit Initiative – Program Objectives for 2006-2007
Overall goals of the current work are to advance the Pike Transit project to the environmental documentation
stage and ensure eligibility for potential federal and state grants. To accomplish this, several activities
need to be further developed related to the technical analysis and conceptual engineering design of the proposed
transit investment.
-
Station Stops – Coordinate with design and construction activities related to the ongoing
Columbia Pike Super Stops program. Wherever possible, future streetcar stations will be located and designed
to take advantage of the planned Super Stops. Identify issues and opportunities with respect to a transit
center and parking structure near the proposed Jefferson Street Station in Bailey’s Crossroads.
-
Right-of-Way Requirements – Evaluate the right-of-way requirements and reservations
associated with implementing the Modified Streetcar alternative.
-
Utility Assessment – Investigate existing utility locations and review recent local
experience to refine estimates for potential relocations associated with the transit project. Coordinate
transit improvement requirements with ongoing utility undergrounding and other county capital programs.
-
Vehicle Storage and Maintenance Facility – Research how other transit properties are
incorporating vehicle and maintenance facilities in urban environments. Identify workable sites for
storage and maintenance of the proposed vehicle fleet along the Columbia Pike corridor.
-
Cost Estimate – Revise the order of magnitude capital cost estimate based on the work
conducted in previous activities.
-
Financial Strategy – Assess the potential funding scenarios for the preferred alternative
recommended in the Alternatives Analysis. Identify a range of potential federal and state grants; local
government funding sources including value capture strategies; and private financing and project development
scenarios.
-
Organizational Strategy – Evaluate the benefits of alternative organizational structures
for implementing the transit project. Potential participants include WMATA, Arlington County, Fairfax
County, VDOT, DRPT, or a new private non-profit entity (in the mold of the Portland Streetcar, Atlanta
Streetcar, Seattle Streetcar, or DC Surface Transit).
-
Implementation Strategy – Based on the technical work developed in the previous activities,
develop an implementation strategy for the streetcar investment recognizing the capital programs planned and
being implemented in the Columbia Pike corridor. The strategy will focus on the key technical and policy
issues and include a timeline for action and project implementation.
-
Coordination – Coordinate with WMATA, Arlington and Fairfax counties, VDOT, and DRPT on an
ongoing basis. Present findings at civic association meetings and supply project updates for use by Arlington
and Fairfax County revitalization offices.
Pike Transit Initiative Background
In 2002, the Arlington County Board approved the Columbia Pike Initiative – A Revitalization
Plan. Part visioning exercise and part implementation plan, the Board established how the
future of transportation and development would look along Columbia Pike, and what steps would be taken
to achieve the vision. Three major transit goals resulted from the Columbia Pike Initiative.
- Improve bus stops along Columbia Pike and provide better information for bus riders;
- Implement improvements to the bus services in the Columbia Pike corridor;
- Plan for long-term higher-capacity transit options.
The first two goals are underway through the PikeRide bus service. The Pike Transit Initiative is focusing
on the final goal, to evaluate and plan for long term higher-capacity transit options along Columbia Pike.
In addition, recognizing the growing need for alternatives
to the automobile, Fairfax County's
Comprehensive Plan supports measures to increase the use of public transit. Transit connections linking
neighborhoods, employment centers, and the regional Metrorail system are cited as specific policy goals.
The Pike Transit Initiative will help to plan for this higher capacity system
along the section of Columbia Pike within Fairfax County.
In 2003, the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), in conjunction with Arlington County
and Fairfax County, initiated the Pike Transit Initiative (officially the Columbia Pike Transit Alternatives
Analysis). The study began with a wide range of alternatives, which were narrowed down to a small set of
alternatives through extensive public input and technical analysis. This small set of alternatives included
a “No Action (or Baseline) Alternative,” and Bus Rapid Transit (BRT), Streetcar, and Modified Streetcar
Alternatives.
The preferred transit investment for the corridor, the Modified Streetcar Alternative, will
combine elements of the other alternatives – notably a streetcar project with continued extensive bus service
– and will improve transit service efficiency and make a significant investment in the community.
One of the goals in defining this alternative was to develop a functional project that could be constructed
as inexpensively as possible, yet would achieve community goals. Basic features of this alternative are as
follows:
- The streetcar line would extend five miles between Skyline and Pentagon City.
- Streetcar service would operate at constant six-minute headways throughout the day.
-
Streetcar service would be augmented with WMATA buses, carry peak passenger demand, and supply
service for trips such as those from Annandale that are more efficiently accommodated via bus service.
The Modified Streetcar Alternative was endorsed for further study by the Fairfax County Board
of Supervisors and the Arlington County Board in the spring of 2006. These
endorsements allowed the project to advance into the
current phase of development, which includes
environmental documentation, development of a financial strategy, and conceptual system design.
|